If you receive errors when attempting to view this white paper, please install the latest version of
Adobe Reader.
"NuView Systems was named a finalist today in the Software & Information Industry Association’s (SIIA) 24th Annual CODiE Awards. The award is based on the best software solution that automates any aspect of human resources management, including HRIS, benefits administration, recruiting, payroll, performance appraisal, asset management, etc. The solution can be distributed as a service (SaaS) or installed (NuView offers both options)."
Source : NuView Systems, Inc
The Truth about Software-as-a-service (SaaS)
Software-as-a-service is also known as :
Benefits Software as a Service,
Best Software as a Service,
Define Software as a Service,
Enterprise Software as a Service,
ERP Software as a Service,
Hosted Software as a Service,
HR Software as a Service,
Management Software as a Service,
on Demand Software as a Service,
Software as a Service,
Software as a Service Advantages,
Software as a Service Application,
Software as a Service Business,
Software as a Service Business Plan,
Software as a Service Company,
Software as a Service Contracts,
about Software as a Service,
Software as a Service CRM,
Software as a Service Definition,
Software as a Service Directory,
Software as a Service Disadvantages,
Software as a Service Example,
Software as a Service Examples,
Software as a Service Growth,
Software as a Service Hosting,
Software as a Service Ideas,
Software as a Service Industry,
Software as a Service Market,
Software as a Service Model,
Software as a Service ppt.
SaaS (Software as a Service), also called on
demand software, is a convenient,
profitable and great business model for
vendors.
Just look at the valuation of the better know
SaaS vendors, including SalesForce.com,
which is held up as the Holy Grail in the
SaaS world, along with Salary.com,
Kenexa and Ultimate in the HR space.
Market Cap/Revenue
|
52 wk High |
52 wk Low |
| Salesforce.com |
7 |
11 |
| Salary.com |
2.5 |
6 |
| Kenexa |
2.1 |
5.5 |
| Ultimate |
4 |
6 |
For shareholders of these companies, this is
great news. A SaaS company promises
continuous income for the investor by
creating a recurring revenue stream,
locking in long term contracts – making the
company an attractive target to park
money.
Benefits to the Vendor
It’s an easy formula. Create the right model
for an important business function and
ensure that the technology can scale. Then
put together a team of specialists to manage
the technical infrastructure, and
management to deliver the functional
outcomes, for accounting, HR, supply chain
or CRM.
Older clients add to the revenue from the
newer clients, creating a steady revenue
stream, and adding to the bottom-line.
Benefit to the Client
For the client, there are low upfront costs.
Executive teams, and Company Boards,
desire to outsource critical functions that
are not deemed part of the organizations’
“core business” address the corporate need
to focus on core business. In particular for
the HR space the perception of HR as a
“cost center”, rather than a strategic partner
in the organization – and makes a contrary
vote all the more difficult.
Significant contributing factors to the SaaS
allure is the promise of providing greater
processing efficiencies than an
organizations’ own internal systems,
thereby lowering process management
costs for HR, CRM or accounting when
managed by a SaaS vendor.
“Best practices” are available to put into
place by the SaaS vendor, allowing client
organizations to meet their basic needs
quickly and efficiently. Especially when the
outsourced function is purely transactional,
the outcome of a SaaS implementation is
positive, presuming the SaaS vendor’s
product and services are managed well.
Where the SaaS model stumbles
The problems begin when a strategic
function, like HR, is fully outsourced.
To execute strategy, it is vital to allow
changes to existing processes, as well as
changes to the organizational structure –
both driven by the economy, global
competition, workforce skills and
competencies, and other factors.
The information derived from closely
monitoring and measuring who is
responsible for what function provides
critical feedback necessary to determine
initiatives that will deliver strategy.
While the SaaS model is good at getting
underperforming departments up to speed,
this model does not work well for an
organization that truly reaches for
greatness.
The SaaS model is managed by personnel
removed from the situation – the objective
of whom is primarily managing a
transactional engine.
Strategy, rooted in the ability to
swiftly react to changes, and set
new policy as a result, takes a
backseat with SaaS.
A significant “trait” of a great company is
its ability to distinguish itself from its
competitors.
The core of greatness comes directly from
the people (staff) that comprise it.
The desire for these individuals to excel
comes from a belief in their abilities and
connecting with the organization’s strategy
and cause. This creates a “passion”, which
needs to be understood, and encouraged,
which is accomplished by providing
systems, information and transparency to
support the goals of these employees and
the entities (departments, units, teams) they
form.
Processes, therefore, must adapt to suit the
needs of its employees, address the cultural
differences between groups, departmental
needs, and countries, while keeping
constant the shared passion, cause that all
the individuals have come together to
deliver for their clients.
A SaaS vendor company, by its definition
of easy, consistent deployments, creates for
the client organization a fixed path to
deployment.
Standard practices are supported, and
anything outside the norm are discouraged.
This leads to deployments that are cookie
cutter arrangements, with the underlying
mantra being that all client organizations
operate, and are deployed, in the same
manner.
There’s not much room for uniqueness,
driving many of the practices that these
organizations are able to deliver into a
system catering to “operational
mediocrity”.
Questions You Need To Ask Yourself
Any organization striving for greatness, and
looking at the SaaS option, needs to
ponder:
“How do we distinguish ourselves from our
competition if we are all doing the same
things?”
Outsourcing a strategic function like HR,
and removing it from the hands of
passionate employees, who require equal
level of commitments from management
and internal processes, will cause
frustration. The internal passion that drives
greatness and success will fade.
People who use systems need different
information, depending on their role and
their familiarity with the system.A product that is very simple to use is a
great when an employee is first introduced
to it or when an employee interacts with it
occasionally.
A product that has complex, but dense
screens, is valuable to an expert -- who
does not want to waste time navigating
many simple screens to get to the
information the employee is looking for.
These changes are specific to each
organization, the people in charge at that
time and their needs for privacy, depth of
information and language of choice.
A SaaS vendor can comply with these
requests from a client only at a very
high cost.
SaaS vendors would have to incorporate
these specific changes to processes for all
clients OR manage them inside a single
code source separately for a specific client,
driving down efficiencies and raising costs.
SaaS vendors would have to incorporate
these specific changes to processes for all
clients OR manage them inside a single
code source separately for a specific client,
driving down efficiencies and raising costs.
Each change that the SaaS vendor decides
to include is considered carefully. If
approved, the change is rolled out in the
next release and made available to all
clients. The small changes that affect a particular
department or a set of managers in a single
company almost never rise to the level of
urgency that will make it into a release.
Even if it did, by the time the release rolls
around, the managers have lost the need or
managed their outcomes outside the
system. The great organization needs to
respond quickly to a critical need.Timeliness is not in the SaaS repertoire.
NuView Position
NuView believes that the software we
deliver has a single overriding purpose, and
that is to make HR strategically relevant.
We support the SaaS environment for
exactly the efficiencies organizations
require to get started -- but we also allow
licensing of the product for internal installs,
which allow mature IT shops to manage,
and own, the HR process themselves.
The potential to manage a separate instance
of the product allows for the unique
changes required for managers, workflows,
acquisitions or cultural adjustments --
without waiting for the vendor to come
around. NuView’s strategy is to manage
best practice transactional outcomes for HR
on a rich technical platform, allowing
organizations to execute their very own
strategy – not those of many other
organizations.
Shafiq Lokhandwala is the founder and
CEO of NuView Systems. His passion for
HR, and his vision for helping HR shape
organizational strategy, has attracted
leading organizations, who share that
vision, to select NuViewHR for their global
HR platform.
155 West Street- Suite 8
Wilmington, MA 01887
978-988-7884
www.nuviewHR.com
For comments, email:info@nuviewinc.com