Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.


If you receive errors when attempting to view this white paper, please install the latest version of Adobe Reader.

"Patni's dedicated IT Governance Center of Excellence (CoE) helps businesses to adopt effective IT Governance strategies that will help them control, comply and align IT with business priorities."
Source : Patni Computer Systems Limited

Resources Related to IT Portfolio Management and IT Governance:

Aligning Business with IT through IT Portfolio Management and IT Governance

Portfolio Management is also known as : Project Management, Investment Management, Systematic Management, Portfolio Management Corporation, Asset Management, Project Portfolio Management, Product Portfolio Management, Financial Portfolio Management, Management Process, Corporate Portfolio Management, Portfolio Management Practitioners, Management Resources, Management Resources, Portfolio Management Tools, Portfolio Management Philosophy, Portfolio Management Executive, Portfolio Management System, Application Portfolio Management, Portfolio Management Solutions, Portfolio Management Discipline,

INTRODUCTION

In a highly competitive global economy, where business uncertainties are frequent and compliance with multiple regulations is mandatory, organizations face a challenging task in keeping pace with changing business trends. In this situation, the primary challenge is to keep the IT organization synchronized with the business strategies to ensure deliverance of maximum business value while reducing IT cost.

However, with multiple IT applications that require continuous pruning and monitoring, and multiple projects running simultaneously, organizations find it difficult to focus adequate attention on their IT application and project portfolios. Most CXOs also have a limited insight on projects executed and the "value" these projects bring to the business.

This paper describes the importance of an IT Portfolio Management (ITPM) framework, which when coupled with an IT Governance (ITG) framework can enable organizations to improve visibility into projects and IT assets keeping them aligned to business objectives at all times. This paper also recommends the approach organizations must take for building the foundation for this combined framework that ensures constant alignment of business with IT.

THE CHALLENGES OF ALIGNING BUSINESS WITH IT

With lack of a proper governance framework, many organizations today do not have adequate visibility into their IT assets. The problem is compounded when organizations are not able to trace and track projects existing in their project portfolios. The result is skewed decisions, unwarranted spending and a continuous struggle to meet business demands and user expectations. Another crippling factor is the fact that most CIO's do not have an adequate mechanism in place to find out the return on investment and the risks involved.

Figure 1: IT decision maker view of the application landscape

The typical IT landscape of most large organizations (as shown in Figure 1) represents a portfolio of applications that has over time, become large and unwieldy to monitor. As a result, most organizations often find it difficult to give information that is vital for ensuring alignment of business operations with IT. For instance, organizations often find it difficult to identify: which applications are eating up more IT resources, which projects need the maximum funding, or, which projects should get the maximum priority?

The inability of the organization to provide information that can ensure IT and business alignment can be nailed down to a few key causes:

  • Inadequate visibility into the application portfolio
  • Inadequate processes in place to continuously monitor and measure an application fit for a business
  • Lack of adequate metrics to measure the success of projects
  • Time, energy and resources drained into maintaining legacy applications, leaving little for value enhancing initiatives.

CIOs striving to achieve synchronization with business are plagued with issues such as ever increasing infrastructure and maintenance costs, growing complexity of their IT infrastructure, and keeping pace with the ever-changing business demands. It has been observed that around 80-90% of the total IT spent is on maintaining the "non value-add" applications. This means that only 10-20% of the total IT budget is available for new initiatives/projects. In such a scenario, the CIO cannot address the issues that he/she faces. To overcome this challenge, the CIO has to ensure that the ratio is brought down so that more funding goes towards value-added work.

The lack of alignment of IT with business causes the business to distance itself from IT. IT is seen as a service provider rather than a partner. As a result, IT involvement in key business decisions becomes an afterthought rather than a prerequisite. For ensuring alignment of IT with business, organizations have to ensure that IT assets be accepted as business assets.

COMPONENTS OF A TYPICAL IT PORTFOLIO

An IT Portfolio consists of IT assets and Projects. Projects represent investment towards creating assets. The assets comprise business applications and infrastructure. Infrastructure assets comprise entities such as servers, desktops, storage solutions, infrastructure management solutions and networks. For purpose of simplicity, we will consider information assets as that which include the vast amount of corporate data, customer data, and process information as part of application assets.

Of all the assets, "Application Assets" due to their inherent nature of closely coordinating with the business processes to deliver value to the business, plays a crucial role in attaining business agility. Most of the key business processes are supported by one or more application. Key business drivers such as increased revenue, enhanced management and operational efficiency are directly dependent on the application portfolio.

To optimize this application portfolio, CIOs should look towards implementing an Application Portfolio Management (APM) framework, which keeps the necessary checks and balances on the applications. The main objective of moving towards an optimized application portfolio should be to eliminate all factors in the application portfolio which constraint the business.

A properly implemented APM framework will ensure the following:

  • Adequate visibility into the application portfolio: An application inventory will help in optimizing applications and prioritizing initiatives.
  • Rationalized application portfolio: A rationalized application portfolio helps in weeding out duplicates, redundancies and obsoletes. This helps in an accurate and more productive application portfolio.
  • Modernized application portfolio:Applications are modernized to retain the investments made in them and at the same time bring them in sync with the business.

An APM will result in bringing down the maintenance cost of the application portfolio freeing up time, money and resources for other value added work. This will result in benefits such as better business decision making, quicker time-to-market and improved customer relationships. Similarly, a project portfolio management (PPM) framework will ensure alignment of projects with business objectives.

ROUTE TO A MANAGED PORTFOLIO - HOW TO PUT A PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK IN PLACE

We recommend the following steps for putting in place a robust framework:

Business problem diagnosis:
Organizations must discuss with senior business and IT stakeholders to identify key business problems. These business problems must be diagnosed with respect to primary factors such as the enterprise, business process, geographies involved, users, applications and IT Infrastructure. One of the key things to be discussed with business owners is the future business direction, and its impact on applications/users/processes

Application assessment:
Organizations must assess applications with respect to the overall alignment with the business. Applications must be analyzed on two primary factors: Technical and Functional. The extent of Technical and Functional gaps in an application should determine the appropriate strategy for that application. The strategy for an application could be retain, replace, migrate, technical extension or functional extension. The inputs from the assessment exercise can be used to identify duplicate applications, duplicate functionalities and mark them for elimination.

ROI analysis:
To ensure that the application portfolio optimization makes proper business sense, it is imperative for organizations to undertake a proper ROI analysis. The key to a successful ROI projection is ensuring accuracy of information captured on benefits, costs and risks during the first two steps.

Project rationalization roadmap:
The rationalization roadmap will list down the projects that have to be executed to rationalize and modernize the application portfolio. A time based project charter listing the projects to be executed as per agreed priorities will be the outcome of this step.

Implement rationalization roadmap:
In this step, organizations must decide on the way they want to implement the rationalization roadmap. Depending upon the number of projects, organizations can decide on teaming up with off-shore/near-shore vendors to ensure faster implementation.

SUSTAINING GAINS THROUGH A GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK

While an optimized application and project portfolio will ensure that IT is synchronized with business, this state of alignment will not remain forever. To ensure that initial gains are not frittered away, organizations have to ensure continuous alignment with business.

Keeping this synchronization intact is a challenging task. Hence, it is very important that after rationalizing and modernizing the application and project portfolio, there should be a process in place to continuously monitor the portfolio and measure the key performance indicators (KPIs) to sustain these benefits. An "IT Governance" framework can ensure sustenance of these initial benefits.

Effective IT Governance is a continuous process that:

  • Ensures that application and project portfolio remain in strategic alignment
  • Provides dashboard driven application portfolio and project monitoring
  • Specifies decision-making authorities and makes them accountable.

The framework will consist of policies, organization structures, roles and responsibilities and business metrics clearly defined and agreed upon. Depending upon the need, the framework should be supported by a good ITG tool. The ITG framework will help to govern and manage both the application portfolio and project portfolio. It will help in decision making while selecting or rejecting projects. A governance framework will ensure that adequate governance policies are in place to manage the organization's progress on the maturity scale.

The necessity of monitoring the portfolio is well understood. The question is: How to monitor? What to monitor? What sort of dashboards to present so that all decisions are well-informed decisions?

It is essential that each asset and project in the IT portfolio be monitored through a "governance radar" and every item on this radar be examined for its fitness to deliver business value on a continuous basis. While managing the portfolio on a day-to-day basis, there should be a process in place to continuously seek out opportunities for optimization.

Any component within the portfolio can be impacted by many factors mainly by change in business processes, market changes or new trends in technology. New initiatives (such as introduction of new technologies) may also have an impact on the portfolio. The governance process implemented should be capable of factoring these factors and determine the scale of impact. The changes in business processes should not be ignored as such changes may impact some of the components (applications, projects, or infrastructure) of the portfolio either directly or indirectly. An effective IT Governance framework should be able to give alerts immediately and trace the probable impacted components.

MEASURING EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH DASHBOARDS

The ITG framework should provide dashboards and metrics that diagnose the portfolio and raise alerts for its non-alignment with business goals. The dashboard and metrics have to be plugged into the necessary data stores and repositories to present correct information. The ITG framework is expected to collect data and produce metrics regarding resource utilization, variances, application spending and project spending. This information can be projected on the application health and project health dashboard.

The dashboard gives a multidimensional view of the entire portfolio. The data points collected for the project portfolio and application portfolio could be different. For each application, the data needs to be captured with respect to various factors such as: cost (maintenance, operations, software licenses, etc.), quality (functional, data, etc.), availability of application and customer satisfaction.

Figure 2: Dashboard providing a multidimensional view of the entire portfolio

At the same time, organizations have to also ensure that the data for each project is captured accurately. The data points for project monitoring could be Variances (schedule, efforts, budget etc.), issues and scope changes, Earned Value, Resource allocation, ROI etc.

It is equally important to monitor risks for each project. An IT Governance (ITG) framework must provide a good risk management plan. It should be able to provide mitigation and contingency plans for each risk identified in risk profiles for a particular project. Each project can be assessed for generic risks such as security, regulatory compliance, resources, vendor viability, privacy, and information risk. It is vital for risk monitoring to be part of the dashboard.

In many cases, the quality of the decision made is dependent on the visibility the decision maker has of the application portfolio. Without this clarity of the portfolio, changes to the portfolio are costly and less efficient. As a result, organizations cannot make informed decisions about prioritizing application changes, modernizing / retiring applications, ensuring regulatory compliance or outsourcing/off-shoring application maintenance. Application maintenance and support is a daunting task because the application portfolio has become a tangled web of interdependent and cross-referenced applications with application owners themselves at loss in determining the best way to respond to day-today maintenance and support problems.

The remedy is to design an application portfolio dashboard that one can monitor to track the performance and the pertinence of the application portfolio on an on-going basis (as shown in Figure 3 for a CRM application). The foundation of this application portfolio dashboard would be the application inventory which would be a central repository having important details built by aggregating information from various sources. This inventory will be updated on an on-going basis to ensure that it stays current.

Figure 3: CRM Application view on an IT Dashboard

The IT dashboard also provides other details on the application such as:

  • Security: Sensitivity of data held or accessed by the application, type of access, and type of threats.
  • Risk Profile: An organization can use information on the dashboard for ascertaining the following:
  • Vendor Viability: Vendor viability if it is a COTS product or requires specific support from a third party vendor
  • Disaster Recovery: Is the application an integral part of the disaster recovery plan
  • Resource Availability : Is there a dearth of resources in the industry
  • Technology viability: Is the technology outdated or will get outdated in the near future.
 

THE IMPORTANCE OF AN OPTIMIZED APPLICATION INVENTORY

The application inventory acts as a quick reference for the organization providing an insight of the available products/systems across the enterprise while enabling to choose a technology that is complimentary to the existing ones. Application Inventory can act as a system of reference to eliminate duplicate application development or deployment. Application owners before authorizing new application development can carry out a quick check of the existing inventory to ensure that there are no instances of other applications fulfilling same or similar requirements. IT managers can more effectively control costs related to upgrade, maintenance and licensing as a result of better visibility about what kind of applications are present in the enterprise portfolio.

APM+ PPM + ITG: ENSURING A CONTINUOUS PERFECTION LOOP

With a portfolio that is rationalized and optimized, organizations can look for further opportunities of optimization of assets. Balancing the asset and project portfolio would require implementing an application and project portfolio framework in combination with an IT Governance framework. Balancing resources and asset requirements will provide a holistic and correct view of IT investments and assets.

Asset and project portfolio are complementary to each other. They are like "Yin and Yang" of ITPM. The concepts of Yin and Yang originate from an ancient Chinese philosophy that describes two opposing but complementary forces. One can be transferred into another. A project after closure and successful roll out creates an asset (application) which will provide further value to the business. At the same time, any impacted asset component that would require further optimization to enhance or sustain its business value would in turn result in creation of a project. The following figure demonstrates the Yin & Yang cycle.

Figure 4: The role of APM, PPM and Governance framework in ensuring a perfection loop

The combination of Application Portfolio Management and Project Portfolio Management, governed by an IT Governance framework will ensure continuous improvement in performance and sustain the portfolio at a high level of optimization. This will directly impact the organization's capability to adapt to business changes faster, execute new initiatives/adopt new technologies, manage changes and resources efficiently.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Sushil Paigaonkar
For over 15 years in the IT industry, Sushil Paigaonkar has worked on a variety of technologies and standards. In the last few years, he has been focusing on Enterprise Applications and Integration. Specializing in Legacy Modernization and Application Portfolio Management, Sushil leads the Enterprise Portfolio Rationalization Centre of Excellence at Patni. He also plays an important role in Patni's consulting assignments focused on helping customers achieve optimal cost-benefits from their application portfolio.

Jayant Ponkshe
Jayant Ponkshe is a Solution Architect with the Manufacturing Solutions Group at Patni. He has over nineteen years of experience in software application design, development and maintenance. As a solution architect, Jayant is combining his experience and expertise in IT processes improvement for providing value added business solutions to Patni's clients.

ABOUT PATNI

Patni Computer Systems Limited (BSE: PATNI COMPUT, NSE: PATNI; NYSE: PTI) is a global IT Services provider servicing Global 2000 clients through its industry practices in Insurance, Financial Services, Manufacturing, Telecom, Retail, Media & Entertainment, Energy & Utilities, and Logistics & Transportation; and through its technology practices.

With an employee strength of over 12,000; multiple offshore development facilities across eight cities; and 23 international offices across the Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific; Patni has registered revenues of US$ 450 million for the year 2005.

Patni's technology focus spans enterprise applications, embedded technologies, e-business, business intelligence & data warehousing, and RFID. Our service offerings include: application development, application management, business process outsourcing, infrastructure management, product engineering, verification & validation, process consulting, engineering services, and IT governance.

Committed to quality, Patni adds value to its client's businesses through well-established and structured methodologies, tools and techniques. Patni is an ISO 9001:2000 certified and SEI-CMMI Level 5 organization, assessed enterprise wide at P-CMM Level 3. In keeping with its focus on continuous process improvements, Patni adopts Six Sigma practices as an integral part of its quality and process frameworks.

For more information, visit http://www.patni.com

Sushil Paigankar
Jayant Ponkshe

 

COPYRIGHT

Copyright ' Patni Computer Systems Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
October 2006

Restricted Rights

This document may not, in whole or in part, be copied photocopied, reproduced, translated, or reduced to any electronic medium or machine-readable form without prior consent, in writing, from Patni Computer Systems Ltd.

All other brand and product names are trademarks of their respective companies.

Patni Computer Systems Limited

India

Akruti, MIDC Cross Road No.21
Andheri (E), Mumbai 400 093
Tel: +91 22 6693 0205
Fax: +91 22 6693 0211

North America

One Broadway
Cambridge MA 02142
Tel: +1 617-914-8000
Fax: +1 617-914-8200

UK & Europe

Vistacentre, 50 Salisbury Road
Hounslow, Middlesex, UK. TW4 6JQ
Tel: +44 20 8538 0120
Fax: +44 20 8538 0276

Japan

4F, Yamaguchikensetsu No.1 Bldg
2-14-8, Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-0052
Tel: +81-3-5549-2200
Fax: +81-3-5549-2261

Table of Contents

 
  • Introduction
  • The Challenges of Aligning Business with IT
  • Components of a Typical IT Portfolio
  • Route to a Managed Portfolio - How to put a Portfolio Management Framework in Place
  • Sustaining Gains through a Governance Framework
  • Measuring Effectiveness through Dashboards
  • The Importance of an Optimized Application Inventory
  • APM+ PPM + ITG: Ensuring a Continuous Perfection Loop
  • About the Authors
  • About Patni
Searches related to Aligning business with IT through IT portfolio management and IT governance :
Portfolio Management | Project Management | Investment Management | Systematic Management | Portfolio Management Corporation | Asset Management | Project Portfolio Management | Product Portfolio Management | Financial Portfolio Management | Management Process | Corporate Portfolio Management | Portfolio Management Practitioners | Management Resources | Management Resources | Portfolio Management Tools | Portfolio Management Philosophy | Portfolio Management Executive | Portfolio Management System | Application Portfolio Management | Portfolio Management Solutions | Portfolio Management Discipline | Corporate Governance | Project Governance | Governance Indicators | Corporate Governance | Effective Governance | Governance Program | Governance Association | Governance Framework | Governance Principles | Governance Solution | Governance Strategy | Implementing Governance | Investment Governance | Governance Issues | Governance Practices | Governance Research | Governance Structure | Governance Information | Governance Processes | Governance Directives | IT Portfolio Management | IT Project Management | IT Investment Management | IT Systematic Management | IT Portfolio Management Corporation | IT Asset Management | IT Project Portfolio Management | IT Product Portfolio Management | IT Financial Portfolio Management | IT Management Process | IT Corporate Portfolio Management | IT Portfolio Management Practitioners | IT Management Resources | IT Management Resources | IT Portfolio Management Tools | IT Portfolio Management Philosophy | IT Portfolio Management Executive | IT Portfolio Management System | IT Application Portfolio Management | IT Portfolio Management Solutions | IT Portfolio Management Discipline | IT Corporate Governance | IT Project Governance | IT Governance Indicators | IT Corporate Governance | IT Effective Governance | IT Governance Program | IT Governance Association | IT Governance Framework | IT Governance Principles | IT Governance Solution | IT Governance Strategy | IT Implementing Governance | IT Investment Governance | IT Governance Issues | IT Governance Practices | IT Governance Research | IT Governance Structure | IT Governance Information | IT Governance Processes | IT Governance Directives | Portfolio Management IT | Project Management IT | Investment Management IT | Systematic Management IT | Portfolio Management Corporation IT | Asset Management IT | Project Portfolio Management IT | Product Portfolio Management IT | Financial Portfolio Management IT | Management Process IT | Corporate Portfolio Management IT | Portfolio Management Practitioners IT | Management Resources IT | Management Resources IT | Portfolio Management Tools IT | Portfolio Management Philosophy IT | Portfolio Management Executive IT | Portfolio Management System IT | Application Portfolio Management IT | Portfolio Management Solutions IT | Portfolio Management Discipline IT | Corporate Governance IT | Project Governance IT | Governance Indicators IT | Corporate Governance IT | Effective Governance IT | Governance Program IT | Governance Association IT | Governance Framework IT | Governance Principles IT | Governance Solution IT | Governance Strategy IT | Implementing Governance IT | Investment Governance IT | Governance Issues IT | Governance Practices IT | Governance Research IT | Governance Structure IT | Governance Information IT | Governance Processes IT | Governance Directives IT | ITPM Portfolio Management | ITPM Project Management | ITPM Investment Management | ITPM Systematic Management | ITPM Portfolio Management Corporation | ITPM Asset Management | ITPM Project Portfolio Management | ITPM Product Portfolio Management | ITPM Financial Portfolio Management | ITPM Management Process | ITPM Corporate Portfolio Management | ITPM Portfolio Management Practitioners | ITPM Management Resources | ITPM Management Resources | ITPM Portfolio Management Tools | ITPM Portfolio Management Philosophy | ITPM Portfolio Management Executive | ITPM Portfolio Management System | ITPM Application Portfolio Management | ITPM Portfolio Management Solutions | ITPM Portfolio Management Discipline | ITPM Corporate Governance | ITPM Project Governance | ITPM Governance Indicators | ITPM Corporate Governance | ITPM Effective Governance | ITPM Governance Program | ITPM Governance Association | ITPM Governance Framework | ITPM Governance Principles | ITPM Governance Solution | ITPM Governance Strategy | ITPM Implementing Governance | ITPM Investment Governance | ITPM Governance Issues | ITPM Governance Practices | ITPM Governance Research | ITPM Governance Structure | ITPM Governance Information | ITPM Governance Processes | ITPM Governance Directives | Portfolio Management ITPM | Project Management ITPM | Investment Management ITPM | Systematic Management ITPM | Portfolio Management Corporation ITPM | Asset Management ITPM | Project Portfolio Management ITPM | Product Portfolio Management ITPM | Financial Portfolio Management ITPM | Management Process ITPM | Corporate Portfolio Management ITPM | Portfolio Management Practitioners ITPM | Management Resources ITPM | Management Resources ITPM | Portfolio Management Tools ITPM | Portfolio Management Philosophy ITPM | Portfolio Management Executive ITPM | Portfolio Management System ITPM | Application Portfolio Management ITPM | Portfolio Management Solutions ITPM | Portfolio Management Discipline ITPM | Corporate Governance ITPM | Project Governance ITPM | Governance Indicators ITPM | Corporate Governance ITPM | Effective Governance ITPM | Governance Program ITPM | Governance Association ITPM | Governance Framework ITPM | Governance Principles ITPM | Governance Solution ITPM | Governance Strategy ITPM | Implementing Governance ITPM | Investment Governance ITPM | Governance Issues ITPM | Governance Practices ITPM | Governance Research ITPM | Governance Structure ITPM | Governance Information ITPM | Governance Processes ITPM | Governance Directives ITPM | APM Portfolio Management | APM Project Management | APM Investment Management | APM Systematic Management | APM Portfolio Management Corporation | APM Asset Management | APM Project Portfolio Management | APM Product Portfolio Management | APM Financial Portfolio Management | APM Management Process | APM Corporate Portfolio Management | APM Portfolio Management Practitioners | APM Management Resources | APM Management Resources | APM Portfolio Management Tools | APM Portfolio Management Philosophy | APM Portfolio Management Executive | APM Portfolio Management System | APM Application Portfolio Management | APM Portfolio Management Solutions | APM Portfolio Management Discipline | APM Corporate Governance | APM Project Governance | APM Governance Indicators | APM Corporate Governance | APM Effective Governance | APM Governance Program | APM Governance Association | APM Governance Framework | APM Governance Principles | APM Governance Solution | APM Governance Strategy | APM Implementing Governance | APM Investment Governance | APM Governance Issues | APM Governance Practices | APM Governance Research | APM Governance Structure | APM Governance Information | APM Governance Processes | APM Governance Directives | Portfolio Management APM | Project Management APM | Investment Management APM | Systematic Management APM | Portfolio Management Corporation APM | Asset Management APM | Project Portfolio Management APM | Product Portfolio Management APM | Financial Portfolio Management APM | Management Process APM | Corporate Portfolio Management APM | Portfolio Management Practitioners APM | Management Resources APM | Management Resources APM | Portfolio Management Tools APM | Portfolio Management Philosophy APM | Portfolio Management Executive APM | Portfolio Management System APM | Application Portfolio Management APM | Portfolio Management Solutions APM | Portfolio Management Discipline APM | Corporate Governance APM | Project Governance APM | Governance Indicators APM | Corporate Governance APM | Effective Governance APM | Governance Program APM | Governance Association APM | Governance Framework APM | Governance Principles APM | Governance Solution APM | Governance Strategy APM | Implementing Governance APM | Investment Governance APM | Governance Issues APM | Governance Practices APM | Governance Research APM | Governance Structure APM | Governance Information APM | Governance Processes APM | Governance Directives APM | PPM Portfolio Management | PPM Project Management | PPM Investment Management | PPM Systematic Management | PPM Portfolio Management Corporation | PPM Asset Management | PPM Project Portfolio Management | PPM Product Portfolio Management | PPM Financial Portfolio Management | PPM Management Process | PPM Corporate Portfolio Management | PPM Portfolio Management Practitioners | PPM Management Resources | PPM Management Resources | PPM Portfolio Management Tools | PPM Portfolio Management Philosophy | PPM Portfolio Management Executive | PPM Portfolio Management System | PPM Application Portfolio Management | PPM Portfolio Management Solutions | PPM Portfolio Management Discipline | PPM Corporate Governance | PPM Project Governance | PPM Governance Indicators | PPM Corporate Governance | PPM Effective Governance | PPM Governance Program | PPM Governance Association | PPM Governance Framework | PPM Governance Principles | PPM Governance Solution | PPM Governance Strategy | PPM Implementing Governance | PPM Investment Governance | PPM Governance Issues | PPM Governance Practices | PPM Governance Research | PPM Governance Structure | PPM Governance Information | PPM Governance Processes | PPM Governance Directives | Portfolio Management PPM | Project Management PPM | Investment Management PPM | Systematic Management PPM | Portfolio Management Corporation PPM | Asset Management PPM | Project Portfolio Management PPM | Product Portfolio Management PPM | Financial Portfolio Management PPM | Management Process PPM | Corporate Portfolio Management PPM | Portfolio Management Practitioners PPM | Management Resources PPM | Management Resources PPM | Portfolio Management Tools PPM | Portfolio Management Philosophy PPM | Portfolio Management Executive PPM | Portfolio Management System PPM | Application Portfolio Management PPM | Portfolio Management Solutions PPM | Portfolio Management Discipline PPM | Corporate Governance PPM | Project Governance PPM | Governance Indicators PPM | Corporate Governance PPM | Effective Governance PPM | Governance Program PPM | Governance Association PPM | Governance Framework PPM | Governance Principles PPM | Governance Solution PPM | Governance Strategy PPM | Implementing Governance PPM | Investment Governance PPM | Governance Issues PPM | Governance Practices PPM | Governance Research PPM | Governance Structure PPM | Governance Information PPM | Governance Processes PPM | Governance Directives PPM | KPI Portfolio Management | KPI Project Management | KPI Investment Management | KPI Systematic Management | KPI Portfolio Management Corporation | KPI Asset Management | KPI Project Portfolio Management | KPI Product Portfolio Management | KPI Financial Portfolio Management | KPI Management Process | KPI Corporate Portfolio Management | KPI Portfolio Management Practitioners | KPI Management Resources | KPI Management Resources | KPI Portfolio Management Tools | KPI Portfolio Management Philosophy | KPI Portfolio Management Executive | KPI Portfolio Management System | KPI Application Portfolio Management | KPI Portfolio Management Solutions | KPI Portfolio Management Discipline | KPI Corporate Governance | KPI Project Governance | KPI Governance Indicators | KPI Corporate Governance | KPI Effective Governance | KPI Governance Program | KPI Governance Association | KPI Governance Framework | KPI Governance Principles | KPI Governance Solution | KPI Governance Strategy | KPI Implementing Governance | KPI Investment Governance | KPI Governance Issues |
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
C: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
D: 1 2 3 4 5
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
F: 1 2
G: 1
H: 1 2
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
J: 1
K: 1
L: 1 2 3
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
N: 1 2
O: 1 2
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Q: 1
R: 1 2 3 4 5
S: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
T: 1 2 3
U: 1
V: 1 2
W: 1 2 3
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1

Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Home  |   Careers  |   Contact Us  |   Glossary  |   Special Offers  |   Software Features & Functions  |   Software Selection Shortcuts  |   Feedback  |   Terms of Use  |   Privacy Policy

©2012 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google