Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.


If you receive errors when attempting to view this white paper, please install the latest version of Adobe Reader.

"Microsoft is committed to providing you with technical information on how to better integrate Microsoft and SAP solutions, reduce complexity, and have a continued focus on TCO. The SAP certified Sales and Distribution three-tier standard application benchmark, using SQL Server 2005 and Windows Server 2003 running on HP and Intel hardware, delivered record-breaking results with 93,000 concurrent users."
Source : Microsoft

Resources Related to Standard Benchmark on Hewlett-Packard ProLiant Servers :

Standard Benchmark on Hewlett-Packard ProLiant Servers

Standard Benchmark is also known as : Standard Benchmark, Benchmark, Benchmark Computer, Benchmark PC Software, Benchmark Performance, Benchmark Test, Benchmark Testing, Benchmark Tests, Benchmark Tools, Benchmark Program, Benchmark Software, Benchmark Utilities, Benchmark Utility, Purchase Order, Purchase Order Forms, Purchase Order Management, Purchase Order Number, Purchase Order Processing, Purchase Order Request, Purchase Order Software, Purchase Order SolutionsBenchmarking, Benchmarks Standards, Computer Benchmark Software, Computer Benchmark Test, Computer Benchmarking.

Results Summary

The benchmark was conducted around three core scenarios:

Scenario 1: Mixed Workload

  • Description: Scenario to showcase ability to run mixed workloads, including sales order processing, purchase order processing, and ledger posting, without hitting scalability or response time outage issues.
  • Goal:Provide a good sizing data point for customers/partners for the AOS and database servers, with representative functionality.

Scenario 2: Complex Sales Order Processing

  • Description:Scenario provides an additional data point by processing complex sales orders alone. This scenario excludes purchase orders and general ledger postings, which are far lighter.
  • Goal:Provide a good sizing data point for customers around AOS and database servers, with representative functionality.

Scenario3:Simple Sales Orders,Industry Compare

  • Description:This scenario has the following functional elements disabled to reduce the functional footprint by approximately half: credit limit checking, markup transactions, automatic reservations, commission calculation, and trade agreements.
  • Goal:
    • Industry benchmarks often test limited functionality. This scenario is a comparison point with industry benchmarks around Order to Cash / Sales & Distribution Scenarios.
    • Provide a data point on core technology platform scalability for simple well optimized transactions.
 

High Level Results Summary

 
Response Time Measurement Scenario 1: Mixed Workload Scenario 2: Complex Sales Orders Scenario 3: Industry Compare
Benchmark Core Compare
Concurrency 1,000 Users 1,000 Users 3,000 Users
AOS Server Count 8 8 8
Users Per AOS 125 125 375
% Utilization per AOS 40.29% 45.21% 68.22%
Database Server Utilization 38.26% 44.14% 82.02%
Throughput (Lines Per Hour)
Line Throughput Per Hour 56,645 55,374 165,045
Response Time (In Seconds)
Sales Order Header Creation 0.18 0.20 0.48
Sales Order Line Creation 0.40 0.43 0.46
Sales Order Packing Slip Creation 0.66 0.71 1.22
Sales Order Picking List Generation 0.64 0.68 1.25
Sales Order Invoice 1.68 1.97 2.03
Ledger Header Creation 0.08 N/A N/A
Ledger Line Creation 0.10 N/A N/A
 
Response Time Measurement Scenario 1: Mixed Workload Scenario 2 Complex Sales Orders Scenario 3: Industry Compare
Ledger Posting 0.27 N/A N/A
Purchase Order Header Creation 0.13 N/A N/A
Purchase Order Line Creation 0.15 N/A N/A
Purchase Order Receipts List Creation 0.32 N/A N/A
Purchase Order Invoice Creation 0.74 N/A N/A
 

Benchmark Transaction Profile – Scenario 1: Mixed Workload

The workload consists of the transactions described in the following table. The ratio represents the user breakdown in addition to the overall transaction rate breakdown.

Transaction Detail
Sales Order Processing [Trade Agreements]
20% Lines Receive Standard Discounts
Credit Limit Checking @ Line Level
80% of Lines from 1,000 Item Pool
20% of Lines from 5,000 Item Pool
Automatic Reservations
Markup Freight @ Order Level
[Miscellaneous Charges]
Detailed Sales Tax [6 Tax Codes]
Detailed Tax and Chart of Accounts
Update
Commission Calculation
Cost Accounting Update
Credit Limit Checking @ Invoicing
Purchase Order Processing Markup Transactions @ Order Level
Ledger Posting Create New Ledger
Add 5 Lines
Post Ledger
 

Scenario Mix

 
Number of Users Transactions Per Hour Per User Lines Per Hour Per User
Sales Orders 800 10 50
Purchase Order 150 10 50
Ledger Posts 50 10 50
 

Benchmark Transaction Profile – Scenario 2: Complex Sales Orders

This workload is sales orders only. It resembles Scenario 1, but without the purchase orders or the General Ledger postings. Sales orders are larger and more processing-intensive transactions and are benchmarked separately to provide an additional data point.

Transaction Detail
Sales Order Processing [Trade Agreements]
20% Lines Receive Standard Discounts
Credit Limit Checking @ Line Level
80% of Lines from 1,000 Item Pool
20% of Lines from 5,000 Item Pool
Automatic Reservations
Markup Freight @ Order Level
[Miscellaneous Charges]
Detailed Sales Tax [6 Tax Codes]
Detailed Tax and Chart of Accounts
Update
Commission Calculation
Cost Accounting Update
Credit Limit Checking @ Invoicing
 

Scenario Mix

 
Number Of Users Transactions Per Hour Per User Lines Per Hour Per User
Sales Orders 1,000 10 50
 

Benchmark Transaction Profile – Scenario 3: Simple Sales Orders for Industry Compare

This workload is sales orders only. It differs from Scenario 2 in the following ways:

  • Functionality is significantly reduced to enable comparing Microsoft Dynamics AX 4.0 with other industry benchmarks that test limited functionality.
  • This scenario is not suitable for sizing core sales order functionality for production runs, unless the functional settings are similar.
  • The following functionality from Scenario 1 and 2 was disabled:
    • Trade Agreements
    • Credit Limit Checking
    • Markup Transactions
    • Automatic Reservations
    • Commission Calculation
    • Shipping Information for Order
 
Transaction Detail
Sales Order Processing 80% of Items - 1,000 Item Pool, 20% from 5,000 Item Pool
[Miscellaneous Charges]
Detailed Sales Tax [6 Tax Codes]
Detailed Tax and Chart of Accounts
Update [Ledger]
Cost Accounting Update
 

Scenario Mix

 
Number Of Users Transactions per Hour Per User Lines Per Hour Per User
Sales Orders 3,000 10 50
 

Benchmark Methodology

Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 Team System was used as the load driver, simulating concurrent users through Microsoft Dynamics AX .NET Business Connector. A business transaction was simulated at an average rate of once every six minutes for each concurrent user. Measurements were recorded on all servers and were measured when the concurrency reached steady state. Steady state was maintained for a minimum of 60 minutes with repeat runs within acceptable deviation of throughput and response times.

Notes:

  • All runs had a minimum steady state of 1 hour.
  • Ramp up durations were between 20 and 45 minutes depending on the scenario.
  • Scenarios were considered successful when deviations between runs were within 3% in terms of response time and system utilization.
  • A benchmark user logs on through a business connector. Every effort has been made to simulate standard client behavior. Some differences exist between standard client and business connector users.

Hardware Layout and Configuration

All scenarios were run using the same hardware configuration of 8 homogeneous AOS servers communicating with a single instance Microsoft SQL Server™ 2005 database:

AOS Server Specification

Model HP DL385
Processor 2 x 2.6 gigahertz (GHz) AMD64
Memory 4 GB ECC
HardDisk (BootDrive) 2 x 72 gigabyte (GB) 15K RPM
Raid1
HardDisk (PageFile) 1 x 36 GB 15K RPM
Network HP NC7782 Gigabit Ethernet

AOS Software Settings

3 GB Switch
32-bit version of Microsoft Windows Server® 2003
with Service Pack SP1 (SP1), Enterprise Edition
Single AOS instance per server

Visual Studio Team System Client Specification

Model HP DL145
Processor 2 x 1.8 GHz AMD64
Memory 2 GB ECC
HardDisk Maxtor 40 GB IDE
Network Broadcom NetXtream Gigabit Ethernet

Visual Studio Team System Software Settings

32-bit version of Windows Server 2003 with SP1,
Standard Edition

Database Server Specification

Model HP DL585 Processor 4 x 2.6 GHz AMD64
Memory 16 GB ECC
HardDisk (BootDrive) 2 x 72 GB 15K RPM Raid1
HardDisk (PageFile) 1 x 36 GB 15K RPM
Network Broadcom NetXtream Gigabit Ethernet

Database Software Settings

3 GB Switch
64-bit version of Windows Server°2003 with SP1,
Enterprise Edition
32-bit version of Microsoft SQL Server 2005 with
Service Pack 1 (SP1)

Database Disk Configuration

EMC CX600 /w 4 GB 50/50
Raid Group 0 14 x 73 GB 10K RPM Raid 0 (Database)
Raid Group 1 04 x 73 GB 10K RPM Raid 0 (Log)
Raid Group 2 14 x 73 GB 10K RPM Raid 0 (Database)
Raid Group 3 10 x 73 GB 10K RPM Raid 0 (TempDB)

Benchmark Data Composition

The benchmark was run on a 177 GB base database. The system was configured as follows:

  • 50,000 customers across 100 customer groups
  • 100,000 items across 100 item groups
  • 20,000 vendors across 100 vendor groups
  • Pricing enabled for all items ( Quantity >10 gets 5% line discount or total sale > $ 150 gets 2% discount )
  • Chart of Accounts set up to generate 12 to 22 entries per 5 line sales order
  • 6 Sales Tax Codes set up for orders
  • 10 different Miscellaneous Charges per company
  • Commission calculation set up
  • Shipment enabled for core scenarios
  • History:
    • 2.5 million invoiced sales orders, 12.5 million lines
    • 100,000 purchase orders, 500,000 purchase order lines invoiced
 

Disclaimer

These benchmark results were returned in a controlled lab environment, without other applications running during execution. The benchmark was executed on optimized hardware, using the Microsoft Dynamics AX 4.0 SYS layer without reporting activity during execution. This benchmark is accurate only for the listed hardware, non-customized version of Microsoft Dynamics AX, transaction mix, data composition, and indexes. Microsoft Dynamics is publishing a Benchmark Toolkit for Microsoft Dynamics AX before the end of 2006 on PartnerSource and CustomerSource. Any customer or partner running benchmarks on their own system should expect varying results based on their hardware, customizations, transaction mix, data composition, and indexes. Transaction mix and data composition will have an effect on sizing and hardware requirements.

© 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, the Microsoft Dynamics Logo, Visual Studio, Windows, and Windows Server are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corporation, FRx Software Corporation, or Microsoft Business Solutions ApS in the United States and/or other countries. Microsoft Business

Searches related to Standard Benchmark on Hewlett-Packard ProLiant Servers :
Standard Benchmark | Benchmark | Benchmark Computer | Benchmark PC Software | Benchmark Performance | Benchmark Program | Benchmark Software | Benchmark Test | Benchmark Testing | Benchmark Tests | Benchmark Tools | Benchmark Utilities | Benchmark Utility | Benchmarking | Benchmarks Standards | Computer Benchmark Software | Computer Benchmark Test | Computer Benchmarking | CPU Benchmark | CPU Benchmark Comparison | CPU Benchmark Program | CPU Benchmark Test | Industry Standard Benchmarks | PC Benchmark | PC Benchmark Programs | PC Benchmark Test | PC Benchmark Tests | Processor Benchmark | Standard Application Benchmark | State Standards and Benchmarks | Applications Standard Benchmark | Industry Standard Benchmark | Standard Benchmark Evaluating | Standard Benchmark Performance | Standard Benchmark Proposal | Standard Benchmark Strategy | Standard Benchmark Domains | Standard Benchmark Results | Local Standard-Benchmark | Queries Standard Benchmark | Business Order Forms | Order Form Templates | Order Forms | Order Processing Software | Purchase Order | Purchase Order Forms | Purchase Order Management | Purchase Order Number | Purchase Order Processing | Purchase Order Request | Purchase Order Software | Purchase Order Solutions | Purchase Order System | Purchase Order Systems | Purchasing Order Software | Sales Database | Sales Forms | Sales Invoice | Sales Invoices | Sales Invoicing | Sales Order Book | Sales Order Books | Sales Order Database | Sales Order Date | Sales Order Form | Sales Order Invoice | Sales Order Management | Sales Order Management Software | Sales Order Process | Sales Order Processing | Sales Order Processing System | Sales Order Software | Sales Order System | Sales Order Value | Sales Orders | Sales Purchase | Sales Purchase Order | Sales Template | Sales Templates | Sample Sales | Standard Purchase Order | Order Management | Sales Order Module | Sales Order Preferences | Sales Order Overview | Sales Order Customizations | SD Standard Benchmark | SD Benchmark | SD Benchmark Computer | SD Benchmark PC Software | SD Benchmark Performance | SD Benchmark Program | SD Benchmark Software | SD Benchmark Test | SD Benchmark Testing | SD Benchmark Tests | SD Benchmark Tools | SD Benchmark Utilities | SD Benchmark Utility | SD Benchmarking | SD Benchmarks Standards | SD Computer Benchmark Software | SD Computer Benchmark Test | SD Computer Benchmarking | SD CPU Benchmark | SD CPU Benchmark Comparison | SD CPU Benchmark Program | SD CPU Benchmark Test | SD Industry Standard Benchmarks | SD PC Benchmark | SD PC Benchmark Programs | SD PC Benchmark Test | SD PC Benchmark Tests | SD Processor Benchmark | SD Standard Application Benchmark | SD State Standards and Benchmarks | SD Applications Standard Benchmark | SD Industry Standard Benchmark | SD Standard Benchmark Evaluating | SD Standard Benchmark Performance | SD Standard Benchmark Proposal | SD Standard Benchmark Strategy | SD Standard Benchmark Domains | SD Standard Benchmark Results | SD Local Standard-Benchmark | SD Queries Standard Benchmark | SD Business Order Forms | SD Order Form Templates | SD Order Forms | SD Order Processing Software | SD Purchase Order | SD Purchase Order Forms | SD Purchase Order Management | SD Purchase Order Number | SD Purchase Order Processing | SD Purchase Order Request | SD Purchase Order Software | SD Purchase Order Solutions | SD Purchase Order System | SD Purchase Order Systems | SD Purchasing Order Software | SD Sales Database | SD Sales Forms | SD Sales Invoice | SD Sales Invoices | SD Sales Invoicing | SD Sales Order Book | SD Sales Order Books | SD Sales Order Database | SD Sales Order Date | SD Sales Order Form | SD Sales Order Invoice | SD Sales Order Management | SD Sales Order Process | SD Sales Order Processing | SD Sales Order Software | SD Sales Order System | SD Sales Order Value | SD Sales Orders | SD Sales Purchase | SD Sales Purchase Order | SD Sales Template | SD Sales Templates | SD Sample Sales | SD Standard Purchase Order | SD Order Management | SD Sales Order Module | SD Sales Order Preferences | SD Sales Order Overview | SD Sales Order Customizations | Standard Benchmark HP | Benchmark HP | Benchmark Computer HP | Benchmark PC Software HP | Benchmark Performance HP | Benchmark Program HP | Benchmark Software HP | Benchmark Test HP | Benchmark Testing HP | Benchmark Tests HP | Benchmark Tools HP | Benchmark Utilities HP | Benchmark Utility HP | Benchmarking HP | Benchmarks Standards HP | Computer Benchmark Software HP | Computer Benchmark Test HP | Computer Benchmarking HP | CPU Benchmark HP | CPU Benchmark Comparison HP | CPU Benchmark Program HP | CPU Benchmark Test HP | Industry Standard Benchmarks HP | PC Benchmark HP | PC Benchmark Programs HP | PC Benchmark Test HP | PC Benchmark Tests HP | Processor Benchmark HP | Industry Standard Benchmark HP | Standard Benchmark Evaluating HP | Standard Benchmark Performance HP | Standard Benchmark Proposal HP | Standard Benchmark Strategy HP | Standard Benchmark Domains HP | Standard Benchmark Results HP | Local Standard-Benchmark HP | Queries Standard Benchmark HP | Business Order Forms HP | Order Form Templates HP | Order Forms HP | Order Processing Software HP | Purchase Order HP | Purchase Order Forms HP | Purchase Order Management HP | Purchase Order Number HP | Purchase Order Processing HP | Purchase Order Request HP | Purchase Order Software HP | Purchase Order Solutions HP | Purchase Order System HP | Purchase Order Systems HP | Purchasing Order Software HP | Sales Database HP | Sales Forms HP | Sales Invoice HP | Sales Invoices HP | Sales Invoicing HP | Sales Order Book HP | Sales Order Books HP | Sales Order Database HP | Sales Order Date HP | Sales Order Form HP | Sales Order Invoice HP | Sales Order Management HP | Sales Order Process HP | Sales Order Processing HP | AOS Standard Benchmark | AOS Benchmark | AOS Benchmark Computer | AOS Benchmark PC Software | AOS Benchmark Performance | AOS Benchmark Program | AOS Benchmark Software | AOS Benchmark Test | AOS Benchmark Testing | AOS Benchmark Tests | AOS Benchmark Tools | AOS Benchmark Utilities | AOS Benchmark Utility | AOS Benchmarking | AOS Benchmarks Standards | AOS Computer Benchmark Software | AOS Computer Benchmark Test | AOS Computer Benchmarking | AOS CPU Benchmark | AOS CPU Benchmark Comparison | AOS CPU Benchmark Program | AOS CPU Benchmark Test | AOS Industry Standard Benchmarks | AOS PC Benchmark | AOS PC Benchmark Programs | AOS PC Benchmark Test | AOS PC Benchmark Tests | AOS Processor Benchmark | AOS Standard Application Benchmark | AOS State Standards and Benchmarks | AOS Industry Standard Benchmark | AOS Standard Benchmark Evaluating | AOS Standard Benchmark Proposal | AOS Standard Benchmark Strategy | AOS Standard Benchmark Domains | AOS Standard Benchmark Results | AOS Local Standard-Benchmark | AOS Queries Standard Benchmark | AOS Business Order Forms | AOS Order Form Templates | AOS Order Forms | AOS Order Processing Software | AOS Purchase Order | AOS Purchase Order Forms | AOS Purchase Order Management | AOS Purchase Order Number | AOS Purchase Order Processing | AOS Purchase Order Request | AOS Purchase Order Software | AOS Purchase Order Solutions | AOS Purchase Order System | AOS Purchase Order Systems | AOS Purchasing Order Software | AOS Sales Database | AOS Sales Forms | AOS Sales Invoice | AOS Sales Invoices | AOS Sales Invoicing | AOS Sales Order Book | AOS Sales Order Books | AOS Sales Order Database | AOS Sales Order Date | AOS Sales Order Form | AOS Sales Order Invoice | AOS Sales Order Management | AOS Sales Order Management Software | AOS Sales Order Process | AOS Sales Order Processing | AOS Sales Order Processing System | AOS Sales Order Software | AOS Sales Order System | AOS Sales Order Value | AOS Sales Orders | AOS Sales Purchase | AOS Sales Purchase Order | AOS Sales Template | AOS Sales Templates | AOS Sample Sales | AOS Standard Purchase Order | AOS Order Management | AOS Sales Order Module | AOS Sales Order Preferences | AOS Sales Order Overview | AOS Sales Order Customizations | Standard Benchmark AOS | Benchmark AOS | Benchmark Computer AOS | Benchmark PC Software AOS | Benchmark Performance AOS | Benchmark Program AOS | Benchmark Software AOS | Benchmark Test AOS | Benchmark Testing AOS | Benchmark Tests AOS | Benchmark Tools AOS | Benchmark Utilities AOS | Benchmark Utility AOS | Benchmarking AOS | Benchmarks Standards AOS | Computer Benchmark Software AOS | Computer Benchmark Test AOS | Computer Benchmarking AOS | CPU Benchmark AOS | CPU Benchmark Comparison AOS | CPU Benchmark Program AOS | CPU Benchmark Test AOS | Industry Standard Benchmarks AOS | PC Benchmark AOS | PC Benchmark Programs AOS | PC Benchmark Test AOS | PC Benchmark Tests AOS | Processor Benchmark AOS | Standard Application Benchmark AOS | State Standards and Benchmarks AOS | Applications Standard Benchmark AOS | Industry Standard Benchmark AOS | Standard Benchmark Evaluating AOS | Standard Benchmark Performance AOS | Standard Benchmark Proposal AOS | Standard Benchmark Strategy AOS | Standard Benchmark Domains AOS | Standard Benchmark Results AOS | Local Standard-Benchmark AOS | Queries Standard Benchmark AOS | Business Order Forms AOS | Order Form Templates AOS | Order Forms AOS | Order Processing Software AOS | Purchase Order AOS | Purchase Order Forms AOS | Purchase Order Management AOS | Purchase Order Number AOS | Purchase Order Processing AOS | Purchase Order Request AOS | Purchase Order Software AOS | Purchase Order Solutions AOS | Purchase Order System AOS | Purchase Order Systems AOS | Purchasing Order Software AOS | Sales Database AOS | Sales Forms AOS | Sales Invoice AOS | Sales Invoices AOS | Sales Invoicing AOS | Sales Order Book AOS | Sales Order Books AOS | Sales Order Database AOS | Sales Order Date AOS | Sales Order Form AOS | Sales Order Invoice AOS | Sales Order Management AOS | Sales Order Management Software AOS | Sales Order Process AOS | Sales Order Processing AOS | Sales Order Processing System AOS | Sales Order Software AOS | Sales Order System AOS | Sales Order Value AOS | Sales Orders AOS | Sales Purchase AOS | Sales Purchase Order AOS | Sales Template AOS | Sales Templates AOS | Sample Sales AOS | Standard Purchase Order AOS | Order Management AOS | Sales Order Module AOS | Sales Order Preferences AOS | Sales Order Overview AOS | Sales Order Customizations AOS |
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
C: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
D: 1 2 3 4 5
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
F: 1 2
G: 1
H: 1 2
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
J: 1
K: 1
L: 1 2 3
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
N: 1 2
O: 1 2
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Q: 1
R: 1 2 3 4 5
S: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
T: 1 2 3
U: 1
V: 1 2
W: 1 2 3
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1

Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Home  |   Careers  |   Contact Us  |   Glossary  |   Special Offers  |   Software Features & Functions  |   Software Selection Shortcuts  |   Feedback  |   Terms of Use  |   Privacy Policy

©2012 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google