If you receive errors when attempting to view this white paper,
please install the latest version of
Adobe
Reader.
"RPE embraces communication at all levels as a key success factor
to achieve organizational objectives in a highly dynamic environment. Central to this process is
the efficient use of limited resources, striking balance and achieving a unified and coordinated
effort with software vendors, internal resources and other external resources. "
Source: RPE
Ten Keys for Project Success
Project Team Management is also known as :
Project Team,
Project Success,
Guideline to Insure Project Success,
Goals for the Project Team,
Project Team Template,
RPE Project Management Team,
Keys for Project Success,
Project Team Solutions,
Assembling a Project Team,
Project Team Efforts,
Project Team Definition,
Sample Project Team,
Organizing a Team Project,
Project Team Consists Of,
Project Team Responsibilities,
Successful Project Team,
Team Project Guidance Whitepaper,
Project Team Needs,
Project Team Approval,
Direct Project Team,
Easy Project Management,
RPE Project Team Structure,
about Project Team Management,
Project Team Help,
Regular Project Team Meetings,
Keep the Project Team and Stakeholders Informed,
Software Project Team.
Projects represent a company's attempt to establish competitive advantage and
profit improvement. Successful projects separate companies from those struggling
to compete. Use these ten steps as a guideline to insure project success and
take your company to new heights.
1. Set Expectations: Define the Project
Too often, projects fail because executives, stakeholders and the project
team did not agree on what the project was supposed to accomplish and each
measured the project differently. If everyone involved can agree on the end
goals and major deliverables, the project has a much greater chance of being
viewed as a success at project conclusion.
Begin project definition by thoroughly understanding the current state. Set
the stage by documenting the current processes and tools used. Collect the
documented processes established by management as well as the unique application
of the published guidelines by each business area. The objective is to
understand not just the current tools and processes, but also the business goals
targeted by the current approaches. This step ensures the team is aware of
current functionality so users do not experience a loss of function with the new
process or toolset.
Collect stakeholder and executive requirements for the future vision.
Document the desired processes, tools and timing required. Users often view the
opportunity to state their vision as a chance to "ask for the moon." It is
important to challenge and clarify statements and to move from stated to real
requirements.
Compare the requirements collected to the current processes and tools to
identify the changes required to reach the vision. This gap analysis helps to
identify the unique needs of each business area and lets the project achieve
best practices across the enterprise.
Make sure the change initiative is both process and toolset. Too many
projects become a technology initiative when new solutions are purchased and
implemented. Make sure the investment in technology offers the most direct and
efficient path to success and is not just speeding up the same poor decisions
and processes of the past.
Collect success measures. What Key Performance
Indicators (KPIs) signal project success? Understanding these measures
helps the team focus on the truly important tasks and helps guide project
planning.
Armed with this information, establish the project scope with specific
expectations for success. Be clear on critical dates for key deliverables. If
the gap analysis identifies a great deal of change and effort to reach the end
vision, use a phased delivery approach. Creating several phases to a project
enables the team to avoid over design. Multiple short projects increases speed
to benefit by delivering incremental gains as they are available and does not
require the project to wait for the entire vision to be completed for delivery.
Validate the current state, project requirements and scope with the
stakeholders. Gain signoff from executives and key users on these key documents
to establish clear boundaries and goals for the project team.
2. Get Organized: Create the Project Plan
With a clear vision and understanding of what must be done, it is now time to
create the project plan. This provides the roadmap for project activities and
identifies if the project is ahead of or behind schedule.
Break the project effort into workable portions. Often the tasks identified
require several weeks or months to accomplish. Create tasks that are between a
half day and five days in length. Defining tasks as smaller efforts enables the
project team to more easily understand when a task is complete, assign
responsibility for each task to fewer resources and provides more opportunities
to celebrate success along the way.
Don't forget about administrative efforts. Tasks such as "Schedule the
meeting" or "Recap findings" may seem trivial, but they may take several days to
accomplish. Ignoring these steps unnecessarily introduces a chance to miss
milestones in the plan.
Assign realistic time estimates to these tasks. Refer to past project plans
or functional experts to generate accurate estimates to complete the work. Avoid
the temptation to pad estimates with unnecessary time. Because of contingencies
between tasks and meeting planning, consistently completing tasks ahead of
schedule can create almost as many problems as being consistently late with task
completion.
Incorporate hard dates and contingencies into the plan. If specific deadlines
or meeting dates are provided during the requirements collection step, be sure
to include them in the project plan. Achieving the goals set out by the
stakeholders increases a sense of ownership in project success and eases the
change management effort. Accurately associating one task with another (for
example, software cannot be installed until the machine is purchased and
operational) allows for more accurate tracking of completion status and project
delays are attributed to the actual cause for swifter resolution.
During project planning, focus on implementation and rollout. While it may be
easy for the project team to focus on their efforts required to complete the
project, the real reason for initiating the project is to improve end user
behavior and results. Incorporate sufficient training, documentation and work
time to ensure that project team efforts are accepted and utilized by the
ultimate consumer of the project deliverables.
As the project gets underway, keep a close eye on those tasks that have the
greatest impact on completing on time and watch the critical path. It identifies
tasks that must be completed on time for the whole project to be completed on
schedule. Analysis of the critical path helps to calculate the minimum length of
time in which the project can be completed, and which activities should be
prioritized to complete by that date.
Track and communicate project status weekly. Gains or delays in task
completion timing impact other work efforts down the road. Update task
completion percentages and future date changes to keep the project team and
stakeholders informed. As the project progresses and tasks are completed on
schedule or late, decisions on project scope may be needed or future task timing
may be impacted. Identify and address these issues as early as possible to keep
the project running smoothly.
3. Start at the Top: Gain Executive Support
Somebody at the executive level has approved the project to initiate the
effort in the first place, but does the team truly have full support? The key is
to gain support early on and make sure it does not stop at project meetings and
extends to decisions that impact project scope and resources. Identify executive
support necessary for project success. Look for two types of executives in this
step: Top Level Executives and User Executives.
Top Level Executive support drives User Executive support and can motivate
entire user community through involvement in project communication, kick-off
meetings and rollout meetings. They also approve budgets and ensure the project
team acquires the necessary tools, training and resources for the project to
succeed. Without their support, the project team may not be able to get the
computers, office space, software, server processing time or IT assistance
during the project effort.
User Executives are team leaders for the impacted user groups. Their support
is critical to improve the chances for success of the change management effort.
Without executive support from the user community, project success is at risk
and user involvement in testing, training and rollout activities will be
inconsistent.
4. The Best Teams Deliver the Best Results: Project Team Management
Successful projects have well staffed project teams working together. The
project scope document shows the functional areas impacted by the project and
project plan creation has identified the steps required and the skill sets
needed to complete the effort. Executive support increases the chances of top
performers being made available for project efforts.
Select the most talented people for the project team. Knowledge of existing
company processes and tools makes internal candidates excellent team members. In
addition, internal team members become project champions and change agents
ensuring continued project success once completed. Be sure to help manage
re-entry into the workplace for internal resources so their involvement does not
negatively impact their career path. This helps to ensure a strong internal
resource pool for future projects.
External resources are also a great addition to the project team and can
focus 100% on the project at hand and are not required to juggle other
responsibilities. They are often well-versed in project management and team
dynamics. A very specific skill-set and expertise can be targeted externally
that may not be available in the internal resource pool.
Depending on the size, duration and complexity of the project, adding a
full-time project manager may be warranted. The unencumbered focus on the
project plan and deliverables helps to minimize the impact of competing
priorities, improves the quality of project results and often benefits team
chemistry.
Once the team member selection has been approved, building a strong working
relationship is the next priority. Building a team identity and sense of purpose
helps the group perform at a higher level and improve the quality of work. This
can take time, although facilitation by an experienced project manager can speed
the process. In addition to guiding the team through the process of Form, Norm,
Storm and Perform, keeping team morale high throughout the course of the project
should be a focus of the project manager. Even a small budget for team lunches
or after-work activities can go a long way toward getting maximum effort and
production from the team.
During instances when teammates disagree on key decisions, conflict
resolution is critical. Keep the project team focused on the end-user and
project scope document. Remove personal issues and feelings and keep the focus
on the task at hand.
Priority management can also be an issue with project teams, especially those
heavily staffed with internal resources. Unless the team member has been
completely removed from their other job responsibilities, it can be difficult to
manage both project tasks and outside pressures. Keep internal teammates focused
by temporarily changing their reporting structure to ensure commitment to the
project team, tasks and success. When this is not possible, partnership with
user executives is critical.
Meeting management is another key for project success. Involve those outside
the direct project team only when necessary. Executives, users and IT resource
involvement should follow a `confirm and critique' approach instead of asking
them to create content from scratch. Because of other responsibilities outside
of the project, don't assume participant from outside of the project team will
work on project tasks outside of set meeting times. Build time into meetings to
read documents and brainstorm feedback. Incorrectly assuming those tasks will be
completed by all participants prior to the actual meeting will compromise the
meeting agenda and require those who did complete the work to sit through a
review for those who did not.
5. Prepare for the Inevitable: Risk Management
Risk management is a clear focus on the identification of risk and the
reduction in probability and impact of that risk. Begin by brainstorming the
business, legal, technical and organizational risks to the project early in the
process. Build time into the project plan for this effort. Involve functional
experts from the business, legal and technical areas to identify as many
potential risks as possible.
In addition to identifying the risks themselves, identify triggers that may
increase the probability of the risk happening. These triggers are early
indicators of risk occurrence and can help the project team mitigate the impact
of the risk on project success. During brainstorming meetings, also gather risk
symptoms to assist in the early identification of risk occurrence.
Classify each of the potential risks with an impact rating and probability of
occurrence. Every risk does not have the same impact. Probability of risk
occurrence can be listed as low, medium or high. Based on past projects and
company acceptance of change efforts, this probability rating can help focus the
project team on more likely issues.
Create contingency plans for high impact or high probability risks. These
risks can have the largest impact on the bottom line and have a good chance of
becoming real issues. Create plans with tasks, timing and probable resource
assignments that can be quickly put into action if the risk situation is
identified.
6. Stick to the Plan: Scope Management
Now that a plan and the team are in place, it is important to stay focused.
Keep the end goal in mind and practice scope management throughout the life of
the project.
Once a project is underway and existing processes and tools are being
examined, users often see an opportunity to accomplish alternate agendas. While
it is tempting to fix additional issues identified and further improve processes
and tools, do not let these temptations impact the success of the original
project as defined by the project scope. Establish and strictly keep to a scope
change process.
All changes to scope should require project team approval. This includes
additions and deletions from the task list. It is tempting to address issues
outside of scope as they are identified. However, because the project plan is
often a tightly woven web of interdependent tasks involving several people,
coordination of any change is required. Regular project team meetings provide a
forum for minor changes to the project effort. If the team can agree that the
gains from the change do not impact the overall scope and timing of the central
effort than the change is a positive one that can be added.
Changes to approved deliverables or dates require project team, stakeholder
and executive approval. If the agreement with the stakeholders and executives
documented in the scope document is in jeopardy, it is the responsibility of the
project team to present these suggested changes and gain consensus before
deciding to act. Because the scope document should be viewed as the project
charter and the reason for project team formation in the first place, suggested
changes to this document must be treated with the utmost respect.
Many excellent suggestions for change and project work emerge once the
project team begins its efforts. For those suggested scope changes that are not
approved by either the project team or the stakeholders and executives, document
them for future phases. While adding them to the existing project plan may
jeopardize success for the current project, they may be valuable insights and
suggestions that will provide benefit for future project phases and work.
7. Deliver on the Plan: Quality Assurance
With all of the time and effort that has gone into building and preserving
the project plan, it is all the more important to meet the requirements
established. A solid quality assurance plan and approach ensures that the
project deliverables fulfill the requirements voiced by the stakeholders.
"On Time, On Budget or a Quality Result - you can have any two." It is a
dilemma that does not need to be a project reality. With proper planning and
sound quality assurance techniques, the best run projects should expect quality
deliverables on-time and on-budget.
If available, involve the Quality Assurance (QA)
team early in the planning and risk management stages. Schedule reviews and
audits throughout the project to identify quality issues earlier in the timeline
so fixes can be created as part of the normal operations so project quality and
timing do not suffer.
Create functional design documents to guide the work and provide a
measurement guideline for success. These
Functional Requirements Specifications (FRS) spell
out the user requirements in great detail and provide a blueprint for the
project team. The best FRS templates focus on the business goal of the change,
provide scenarios explaining how real-world business events would interact with
the change and document the effort in sufficient detail to drive the work. The
FRS should also list all project assumptions made, so when stakeholder signoff
is achieved there are no surprises.
The FRS now represents the agreed upon user requirements in a clearly
documented format. Once an FRS has gained stakeholder signoff, technical
requirements and the corresponding technical specifications can be created that
will support the functional requirements. QA teammates can now use the FRS to
create test scenarios to test the new deliverables and processes for accuracy.
When creating the test scenarios, use business data that represents
real-world examples. Once the final project deliverable passes these test
scenarios, the business users and stakeholders should have confidence that the
project has delivered on its promise, improves business results and fulfills
project requirements.
When deciding if the project deliverable passes a test scenario, the pass or
fail determination is not always a black and white decision. The QA team should
pre-determine what results will determine a passing grade. These quality
tolerance levels help the team keep in mind that the final product doesn't have
to be perfect, it just needs to be good enough to fulfill the business needs and
meet project requirements.
Quality is defined by both the technical and business recipients of the
deliverable. The users should be interviewed to understand their needs and these
requirements are the drivers of the quality process.
Complete business and technical testing prior to pilot. Internal testing of
the deliverable by the project team and QA department minimizes distractions to
the end users while still delivering on the project scope.
Once the project is complete, close the project with client satisfaction
survey. Gain an understanding of how the project was perceived from the user
point-of-view. Knowledge of how the project deliverables met user requirements,
quality of project team communication and an indication of good user time
management helps the project team do a better job on future efforts. Compile and
distribute lessons learned to the project team and sponsors to validate the
effort. This type of closure document is also a useful tool for determining team
rewards.
8. Spread the News: Communicate Early and Often
Build a communication plan as part of initial project planning. With the
input of the entire project team, determine the messages to communicate, the
recipients of those messages, the teammates responsible for crafting the
message, the media used to send those messages and the timing of message
delivery.
Pick the right audience for each message. The same message may be received
very differently by each group. While the message may stay the same, changing
the communication vehicle or timing helps to personalize the message and enables
each recipient to receive and process the message content in their own way.
Sharing the project overview, benefits and timeline prepares the user
community for the upcoming change. This communication should come at the
beginning of the project so barriers for change success are identified early and
the project team has the entire project duration to address these challenges.
Project status updates provided weekly keeps the project on schedule and
stakeholders in the loop. There will likely be small changes in scope and timing
as efforts progress. The sense of ownership for those outside of the immediate
project team grows with the level of information shared.
Publication of project success rewards and motivates both the project team
and user community. Project team members will likely value recognition of their
efforts along the way. However, understand the unique motivators for each
project team member. Some people find public recognition to be unpleasant and
this type of communication may be counter-productive. Early user success, such
as gains made by the pilot group, can be a useful tool to motivate the larger
user population during rollout.
When building the communication plan be aware of the other responsibilities
of the recipients. Don't be guilty of "communication overkill" or you will lose
stakeholder interest. Too much communication may irritate the audience and cause
them to stop attending meetings or ignore future messages. Communication must be
concise and timely to keep stakeholder interest and participation levels high.
9. Gain User Acceptance: Change Management
The communication plan is just one piece of the overall change management
effort. The challenge of changing human behavior is often the biggest obstacle
to overcome when working to achieve project success.
The primary goal of many projects is consistent use of best practices. While
creation of new tools supporting the best practices may represent a significant
portion of the project effort, changing user behavior to follow the best
practices and use the new tools should be the end goal.
To successfully change long-term behavior, the project team needs to move end
users from one comfort zone to another. When people become comfortable with a
process and toolset, they become locked in their ways. It takes a
well-formulated change management effort to break them out of the current way of
doing things. Only once the affected user base has been taken out of their
comfort zone are they ready to accept a new way of doing things.
The first step in a successful change management effort is to identify all
stakeholders involved in the change. Leaving out even a small group of those
impacted by the change can have a ripple effect throughout the organization.
Show all stakeholders what's in it for them. People are driven by achieving
their goals. Show those impacted by the upcoming change how their jobs will be
better after the change. If the team cannot show somebody how the proposed
change will benefit them, they will be incited to oppose the change effort.
Effecting change is difficult - implementing change without benefit is almost
impossible.
When rolling out the new tools and processes, test the new approach with a
pilot to learn issues and fix them prior to rollout. Even the best plans will
have gaps not realized until the project encounters real business issues. Apply
the change to a small group of users in a controlled environment and pay special
attention to the actual results realized. While this approach may add a few
weeks to the realization of the company-wide benefits, the last-minute
opportunity to fine tune the change or avoid far-reaching mistakes should not be
bypassed and lost.
Don't skimp on the time and resources allocated to train the users on the new
tool and process. Plan time in the classroom to demonstrate how the new tools
and processes should be used with real business examples. Create documentation
on the new process and toolset, including cheat sheets that are easy to use and
understand. Cheat sheets help the user community integrate the new approach into
their workday while the rest of the documentation preserves the knowledge
capital of the project team once the project is complete and the team has been
disbanded.
Insure the change perseveres by setting clear and achievable deadlines with
multiple progress checkpoints. Along the way, support users with working
sessions where the project team can provide process and tool expertise while the
user group applies the new approach to their business. The structured work time
insures focus on the change effort when other responsibilities could distract
them.
Measure compliance by tracking use of the new tools and processes. Some
projects insert new approval forms or easily tracked system steps to identify
which users or business areas are more quickly applying the new approach and
those who are slower to adopt the change. Use these measures to communicate,
celebrate and reward success.
10. Quantify Results: Measure Project Success
From the early project planning efforts and scope document creation, the team
has identified
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) that demonstrate
project success. These measures should be gathered across all impacted areas
prior to the implementation of the change to establish a pre-project baseline.
In addition, the team should measure these KPIs along the way to track progress,
motivate users to change their behavior and insure the project is keeping on
schedule.
Once the change has been rolled out to the entire company and the impact of
the change can be measured, collect post-project values to calculate the benefit
of the project. Most projects require a business case to justify the time and
expense of the project. Comparison of the KPI baseline with those measures
gathered after project completion gives a good indicator of the project's
overall impact. Comparing these gains to the anticipated benefits helps the
project team do a better job of estimating benefits for future project efforts.
About the Author
John Schwechel is the Replenishment Practice Lead and Senior Project Manager
with Retail Process Engineering, LLC. His background at Target Stores, Andersen
Consulting, E3 Corporation, JDA Software and
Retail Process Engineering (RPE) gives him unique
insight into retail change initiatives and their success factors. Visit
www.rpesolutions.com to learn more.