If you receive errors when attempting to view this white paper, please install the latest version of
Adobe Reader.
"Provide software training - redefined as goal-oriented software instruction and
customization - to reduce frustration and help you save money, gain time, and win new business. "
Source : Efficient Office Computing
The Importance of Software Training: Save Money While Improving Workplace Morale
Software Trainings is also known as :
Software Training Company,
Software Training Consultants,
Software Training Guide,
Software Training Manuals,
Software Training Material,
Software Training Plans,
Software Training Programs,
Software Training Review,
Software Training Seminar,
Software Training Services,
Software Training Solutions,
Software Training Tools,
Software User Training,
Software Training Course,
Software Application Training,
Software Development Training,
Software Product Training,
Software Skills Training,
Software Support Training,
Software Testing Training,
Trading Training Software,
Training Administration Software,
Training Creation Software,
Training Module Software,
Training Registration Software,
Training Software Reviews,
Ultimate Software Training,
Virtual Training Software,
Web Based Training Software,
Web Training Software,
Accounting Software Training,
Attention Training Software,
Best Software Training,
Business Software Training,
Computer Based Training Software,
Computer Software Training.
By Ellen DePasquale – The Software Revitalist™
Efficient Office Computing
Businesses spend millions of dollars on software to help employees work
efficiently. Unfortunately, millions of dollars are also lost in payroll
expenses when employees encounter software problems due to lack of education or
less-than-intuitive software interfaces.
By attending to their technology usage, businesses can not only recuperate a
large percentage of lost payroll wages but also improve employee confidence and
reduce computer-based stress in the workplace.
The Costs of Software Problems
At What Price?
Frustrating experiences waste an average of 42-43% of the time employees
spend at their computers, according to the User Frustration with Technology in
the Workplace study co-sponsored by Carnegie Mellon University, Towson
University, and the University of Maryland. This calculation includes time lost
trying to solve the problem and time spent recovering any lost work.
The Employment Situation: June 2009 report, dated July 2, 2009, issued by the
United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, states the
average earnings of “production and nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm
payrolls” was $609.37 per week.
If we estimate in an average week that an employee spends 20 hours at their
computer, then 8.6 hours (or 43%) are unproductive and frustrating. For a 40
hour/week employee, that equals $131.01 weekly or $6,550.50 annually (50 weeks)
in lost payroll.
“I hate not being able to understand things. It makes me feel
inferior, computers have a way of doing that sometimes.”
Some Things Are Beyond Price!
Lost wages and productivity are only one side of the issue for businesses;
frustration and workplace interruption are the other. When those two issues
combine, as what typically happens when employees have problems with their
software, the cost is incalculable.
“Every computer user encounters problems with technology. Frustration is a
common theme among computer users,” according to research done by the Department
of Sociology, University of Maryland.
Frustration is an important workplace issue because it is not isolated. When
frustration is felt in the workplace, the actions taken can be long-lasting, far
reaching and disruptive, “which can adversely affect work performance as well,”
states a Carnegie Mellon University and University of Maryland joint study,
published in Computers in Behavior 22 (2006).
This study revealed that a single computer problem has the potential to
reduce the employee’s productivity for the remainder of the day. Frustration is
not limited to the length of time the problem occurs, but also leads “to a
longer term mood state that might last hours.”
“I’m also very frustrated by people’s frustrations with
computers.”
The effects of software-based frustration are also not limited to the
individual. In most cases, they engaged one or several other employees to either
help solve the software issue or to be an emotional support. Either way, other
staff members, as well as the initially frustrated employee, are accumulating
unproductive time. “Computer Rage” is a term coined by the Laboratory for
Automation Psychology and Decision Processes, at the University of Maryland. In
their (2005) survey, they collected comments from survey participants regarding
their frustrating computer experiences. Here are just a few:
“I constantly cursed aloud (some REALLY bad words) and I think
my colleague is still scared of me for that. It must’ve not been easy for
her…”
There are a wide range of reactions to coworker computer rage. Some employees
may shut it out, literally, by closing their office doors or even leaving the
office. Other employees may feel frustrated or angry as a result of the rise in
overall tension in the office. Unfortunately, the energy generated by computer
rage has the potential to spread to communications with customers, either by
salespeople or customer service. This is when the cost of computer rage becomes
unbearable.
Software Training Redefined: Educate Your Employees – Train Your Software
A bilateral approach to reducing employee frustration from software issues
includes user education and improving the software’s interface.
Employee Education: Make It Personal
An employee’s frustration level is directly related to their self-efficacy.
Employees who believe they can solve the problem will become less frustrated
because they approach the issue as a challenge instead of a problem. Education
that instills confidence and knowledge will result in fewer issues and lower
levels of frustration.
“…I’ve slammed a keyboard a few times but haven’t caused any
permanent damage. Sometimes I feel like I want to scream when something doesn’t
work but I’d say I’m pretty good at suppressing my anger.”
Targeted materials and curriculum delivered by an experienced instructor are
the keys to success. Adults become annoyed and even frustrated when they feel
the material being taught is irrelevant (Science, 1992), so classes need to be
built around the employees’ responsibilities, needs and goals.
Software Training: Customization without Programming
“Training” the software involves utilizing built-in functionality to
personalize menus and layouts to the employee’s role and responsibilities in the
organization. Employees across different departments utilize software
functionality in very different ways to accomplish their tasks. Customizing
interfaces makes repetitive tasks easy and quick, and organizes important
information for easy access.
The features and functions employees use most should be at their fingertips.
Templates, macros, screen views, and menu options are other features that make
software more intuitive to the needs of the employee. The use of those elements
enables employees to more easily complete computerized tasks in less time.
“Clearly, it would behoove businesses to invest in both the
technology and the training of their staff in the technology in order to improve
productivity.”
Computers in Human Behavior 22 (2006)
Summary
“Computer rage” is inevitable and costs businesses millions of dollars annually
in lost payroll, lack of productivity, and workplace tension. In order to
achieve a reduction in the frequency and level of computer rage, businesses must
invest in employee education and software customization. Increased knowledge and
improved software usability eases employee frustration when software does not
behave as expected. Confident employees are more apt to solve issues quickly,
without disrupting the rest of the workplace, effectively saving time and money.
References:
The Employment Situation: June 2009
United States Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics
www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
User Frustration with Technology in the Workplace
Jonathan Lazar and Adam
Jones
Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Center for Applied
Information Technology, & Universal
Usability Laboratory
Towson
University, Towson, Maryland, 21252
Katie Bessiere, Human-Computer Interation
Institute
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Irina Ceaparu and Ben Shneiderman
Department of Computer Science,
Human-Computer interaction Laboratory, Institute for Advanced Computer
Studies & Institute for Systems Research
University of Maryland, College
Park, Maryland 20742
Social and Psychological Influences on Computer User Frustration (Newhagen
book chapter)
Katie Bessiere and John Robinson, Department of Sociology
University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Irina Ceaparu and Ben
Shneiderman
Department of Computer Science, Human-Computer interaction
Laboratory, Institute for Advanced Computer Studies & Institute for Systems
Research
University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Jonathan
Lazar, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Center for Applied
Information Technology Towson University, Towson, Maryland, 21252
Computer Rage Survey
Of the Laboratory for Automation Psychology and
Decision Processes
University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
http://lap.umd.edu/Computer_Rage/Tech_Report/written_comments/frustration
A model for computer frustration: the role of instrumental and dispositional
factors on incident, session, and post session frustration and mood
Computers
in Human Behavior 22 (2006) 941-961
Katie Bessiere, Human Computer
Interaction Institute, School of Computer Science
Carnegie Mellon University
5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
John E. Newhagen, Philip Merrill
College of Journalism
University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
John
P. Robinson, Department of Sociology
University of Maryland, College Park, MD
20742
Ben Shneiderman, Department of Computer Science
University of
Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn; A Comprehensive Guide to Teaching All
Adults
Third Edition 2008
Raymond J. Wlodkowski
Dependence of Cortical Plasticity on Correlated Activity of Single Neurons
and on Behavioral Connext
E. Ahissar, E. Vaadia, M. Ahissar, H. Bergman, A.
Arieli, M. Abeles
Science, 1992